Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Estate of Leighton Charles Fitz et al v. Stoner et al
as 1:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Estate of Leighton Charles Fitz and Charles Fitz
Defendant:
Rod Stoner , Hardin County, Iowa , City of Iowa Falls, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. McCool et al
as 2:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
Joel Lavel Robinson and J.R.'s Legal Services
Defendant:
William McCool, Annette Hayes and Ronald B Leighton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Turner et al v. Opportunity Council Company et al
as 2:2015cv01969
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A Turner
Defendant:
Opportunity Council Company, Kathy Clark, Kile Beaudry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
H. Laskey v. City of Baltimore
as 15-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. LEIGHTON LASKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BALTIMORE, MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, LAW DEPT. FOR THE CITY OF BALTIMORE and others
Laskey v. City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2015cv02995
Plaintiff:
H. Leighton Laskey
Defendant:
City of Baltimore, Mayor & City Council for the City of Baltimore, Law Dept. for the City of Baltimore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyler Hammond v. City of Wilkes Barre, et al
as 15-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYLER HAMMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
WILKES BARRE CITY and MAYOR THOMAS M. LEIGHTON
Pittman v. City of Leighton, Alabama et al
as 3:2014cv02414
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pittman
Defendant:
City of Leighton, Alabama and Lance Pace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
RETZLER v. LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2014cv04718
Plaintiff:
WESTLEY A. RETZLER
Defendant:
DENNIS LEIGHTON, JAMES P. MCANDREW, KEVIN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
