Cases 41 - 50 of 50,456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and Prince of New York
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Georgia v. Pittman
as 1:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Nadira A Pittman
Peterson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv02056
Plaintiff:
William Peterson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kurtz et al v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
James D Kurtz and Alisanny Montero
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, N7445 Racetrack Road and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gakuba v. Maryland State Police et al
as 1:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Maryland State Police, Maryland Parole and Probation Dept., David Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scholl et al v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2024cv04435
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Scholl and Frank Bednarz
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Brendan F. Kelly, Governor Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
