Cases 81 - 90 of 123
Wilson v. Louisiana Tax Commission et al
as 2:2010cv03338
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Wilson
Defendant:
Louisiana Tax Commission, State of Louisiana, Whitney Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason Wilson, et al v. Barry Groves, et al
as 10-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MASON L. WILSON
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
TAMESH WILSON
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
BARRY P. GROVES, THERESA F. GROVES and SYLVAN-WHITTLE REAL ESTATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILSON et al v. GROVES et al
as 3:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
MASON L. WILSON and TAMESH WILSON
Defendant:
BARRY P. GROVES, THERESA F. GROVES and SYLVAN-WHITTLE REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McGruder et al v. Beebe et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Julious McGruder, Loretta Jarrett, Calvin Holden and others
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Arkansas Supreme Court, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Wilson v. Wilson-Polson et al
as 1:2009cv09810
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L. Wilson
Defendant:
Mayela Alissa Wilson-Polson, Elisa Barnes, Carol J. Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WILSON
as 3:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
JOY L WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
