Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Johnson v. City of Port Clinton et al.
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Port Clinton, Michael Snider, Tracy Colston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
C.C. v. Colston et al
as 7:2022cv02356
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Defendant:
Joshua L Colston, Second Chance Emergency Placement Inc, Naran Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunigan et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv11038
Plaintiff:
Renee Dunigan and Michelle Colston, Individually and as Next Friend of A.C., a Minor, D.W., a Minor and S.W., a Minor
Defendant:
Trooper Michael Thomas, Trooper Blake Ellsworth, Trooper Maxwell Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MULLEN v. Department of Corrections of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40116
Plaintiff:
Jason Mullen
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of Massachusetts, Christopher Phillips, James Gearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B. et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 4:2021cv07078
Plaintiff:
Zelda B., Brian A Thomas, Cynthia M. and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Oakland Unified School District and Larichea Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
