Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,957
Baier v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff: Edward Baier
Defendant: City of San Diego and Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04205
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff: James Lucien
Defendant: John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Jursek et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Andrea D George
Defendant: Colville Confederated Tribes, Alice Koskela, Shannon Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant: City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant: United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv01142
Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant: Kamala Harris and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
East v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff: Billy Flint East
Defendant: Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Donna Conyers Yeatman, James S Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50377
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?