Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pennington v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Does Arianna, H&R Block Agent; John Doe, Agent, Internal Revenue Services; John Doe, Agent and JoAnn Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ketchup v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv01915
Plaintiff:
Crystal Ketchup and Crystal Jackson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Fulton County Sheriff's Department, San Bernardino County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. IRS, et al
as 4:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Nancy Acevedo
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Diane Usry, Geralda Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weickgenant, et al v. US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
The Weickgenant Family and Tom Weickgenant
Defendant:
US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
