Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2287
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ashley McKenzie Smith
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Cerelyn Davis, Nahum Dorme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lasseque v. Lefebure et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Lasseque
Defendant:
FNU Lefebure, Richard Delgardo, Dean Zambarno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallet et al v. Broussard et al
as 6:2021cv03803
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mallet and Nicholas Penn
Defendant:
City of Crowley, Police Dept of Crowley and Allen James Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams III v. Mallet, Jr. et al
as 1:2021cv22222
Defendant:
GREGORY MALLET, JORGE PRINCE JR. and Jorge Prince, Jr.
Plaintiff:
PALMER WILLIAMS III and Palmer Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy et al v. Children's Law Ctr, et al
as 1:2021cv02175
Defendant:
Christie's Inc., Chimpanzee Productions Inc, Chinses American Planning and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mallet v. Geans et al
as 6:2019cv00427
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine Mallet
Defendant:
James Mitchell, Logan Duplechien, Jamie Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Wright v. Mallet
as 2:2018cv06149
Defendant:
LAPD Officer Mallet
Plaintiff:
Jon Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
