Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Matthew Dec v. County of Butler, et al
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, BUTLER COUNTY PROBATION, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
DEC v. BUTLER COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY, BUTLER COUNTY PROBATION, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Dec v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA Attorney General, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PA Chief Counsel Office, PennDot and PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY SOLICITORS OFFICE, Butler County Solicitors Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kenneson v. Vaccarelli
as 23-1263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kimberly Kenneson and Conrad Membrino
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew P Vaccarelli, James O'Sullivan, Shaelyn Barone and others
Lux et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Herbert W. Lux, Jr. and Janice M. Lux
Defendant:
Roger L Harris, S A Norris, B. Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kovalchuk et al v. Smith
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Maxim Kovalchuk and Julia Kovalchuk
Defendant:
Hon. Matthew P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vyletel v. University of Michigan - Dearborn et al
as 2:2022cv13067
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan - Dearborn, Eric Kirklin, Shawn Simone and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
