Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Ferguson v. George et al
as 1:2013cv06609
Plaintiff:
Howard Ferguson
Defendant:
Mark George, Joseph Kurpiel, Jerry McRoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grevan et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv01799
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Ava Arpaio , Charity McRoy and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Grevan , Bridget Kelley , Jonathan Stencel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Bardes v. John Magera
as 09-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next friend of his two minor children, DAB and APB
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social Services, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant - None:
ODESSA WILLIAMS, individually and in her official capacity as Charleston County Department of Social Services Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bardes v. Magera et al
as 2:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
David A Bardes
Defendant:
John M Magera, State Of South Carolina, Charleston County South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
