Cases 161 - 170 of 346
Blevins v. Lightle
as 4:2016cv00436
Petitioner:
Joel Allen Blevins
Respondent:
Arthur Lightle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blevins v. Lightle
as 6:2016cv00288
Petitioner:
Joel Allen Blevins
Respondent:
Arthur Lightle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Masonoff, et al v. Dubois, et al
as 16-1742
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MASONOFF, ROBERT FOSTER, ANTHONY SMITH and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
KEVIN UPSHAW
Defendant:
LARRY E. DUBOIS, Commissioner of Correction
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN BISSONETTE, Superintendent of Southeastern Correctional Center and RICHARD GJ GRELOTTI, Administrator of Bridgewater Complex
Interested Party:
MICHAEL TARRANT, VICTOR VEGA, ROBERT M. BRUZZESE and others
Blevins v. USA
as 1:2016cv00218
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joe S Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blevins v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01146
Movant:
Roger Dale Blevins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wikoff v. Dameron et al
as 3:2016cv04765
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Wikoff
Defendant:
Dameron and Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eric H. Holder , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wikoff et al v. Western Regional Jail Medical Staff et al
as 3:2016cv04542
Plaintiff:
Michael David Wikoff, Christopher Michael Meyers and Zachary Fields
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail Medical Staff, Blevins, Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeny v. Kyle et al
as 5:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
Marcus James Copeny
Defendant:
Don Kyle, Lt. Hayes, Cpl. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred Huffman v. Blevins, et al
as 16-1913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED HUFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BLEVINS, Pres. Pro Temp of Delaware Senate, GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF DELAWARE, MORGAN ZURN, Deputy Attorney General for the State of Delaware and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
