Cases 11 - 20 of 13,985
Chapman v. Fricovsky
as 2:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Defendant:
Unknown Fricovsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazile v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bazile
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Donald Uhler, Mark Rockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Pool et al
as 5:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Donald Ashley, Jr
Defendant:
B Pool and L Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Donald E Riley
Defendant:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Rogers v. Donald Wenk
as 24-6574
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
DONALD WENK, ERIC EDWARDS, NATHANIEL BROTHERS and others
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. McCrary et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Phillips
Defendant:
Captain Unknown McCrary, Warden Donald Jackson, Lt. Mrs. Unknown Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
JULIAN DEVELL GRADY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. Defilippis et al
as 5:2024cv03513
Plaintiff:
Marquice McClinton
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis, Jacob Blass, Donald O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
