Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 281
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01715
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC)Higgs v. Cates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02415
Petitioner: Maurice D. Higgs
Respondent: B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sabon v. King County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01251
Plaintiff: Ivan Patrick Sabon
Defendant: King County, Seattle Municipal, David Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Thorpe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00066
Defendant: Bo Thorpe
Plaintiff: James Raymond Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00546
Defendant: Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff: Ricky Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin Higgs v. T. J. Watson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1073
Petitioner / Appellant: DUSTIN J. HIGGS
Respondent / Appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden
Higgs v. Cherry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01373
Plaintiff: De'Angelo M. Higgs
Defendant: Leland Cherry, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv03794
Defendant: REGIONAL DIRECTOR, T. WATSON, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff: DUSTIN J. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. WATSON
as 2:2020cv00665
Respondent: T. J. WATSON
Petitioner: DUSTIN J. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Higgs v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00531
Petitioner: Lamont Higgs
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?