Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Littlejohn v. Warren et al
as 1:2020cv01539
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Sheriff Neil Warren, Major Michael Williams, Major Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Miller et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Sadigga Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Major William Ashby, Sgt Christopher Wedding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAtee v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2019cv00661
Defendant:
Cpt. Clifford, Cpt. McKinney, David Ballard and others
Plaintiff:
Mark McAtee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Watkins et al
as 3:2019cv03013
Defendant:
Sergeant Thomas Dean, Lieutenant Zeller, Major Williams and others
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Bratton et al
as 6:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
Max A Kelley
Defendant:
Thomas Barnard, Major William Bratton, III and Contract Monitor Elder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kosinski v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2018cv04561
Defendant:
Sheriff Neil Warren, 5 Unknown Deputy Sheriffs, 4 Unknown Cobb County Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard O. Kosinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 3:2016cv00432
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Major Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Major Williams, Jr. v. C. V. Rivera
as 16-1519
Petitioner - Appellant:
Major Williams, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
C. V. Rivera
Williams v. Rivera
as 2:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Major Williams , Jr
Defendant:
C V Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, et al
as 14-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN FNU WHEELER, WARDEN FNU BETCHER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
