Cases 11 - 20 of 160
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Smith Unit
as 4:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv12499
Plaintiff:
Robert Tubbs
Defendant:
Michael Lewis, James Anderson, M. Tank and others
Miller v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-701-2.
as 4:2022cv04270
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pitts v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Pitts
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Arron Michael Lewis v. M. Gutierrez
as 2:2022cv05832
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
M. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis v. Rechcigl
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Greg Rechcigl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARDLOW v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW
Defendant:
CATHRINE THOMPSON, OFFICER REYES, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02383
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Garrett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Gizzi
as 22-654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clint Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Drew Gizzi, Robert Johnsten, Michael Lewis and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
