Cases 11 - 20 of 302
Searcy v. Paxton
as 23-40377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Helen Truscott, Attorney, Jennifer Burnett, Attorney and others
SEARCY v. BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SEARCY
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED, TOMMY FORD, RICK ANGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEARCY v. KIMBROUGH
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
QUINTIN M. SEARCY
Respondent:
BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Swik v. Castle, et al
as 3:2022cv03075
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jay Swik
Defendant:
Searcy County Jail, Sheriff Kenny Castle, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swik v. Searcy County Jail
as 3:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swik
Defendant:
Searcy County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swik v. Searcy County Jail
as 4:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swik
Defendant:
Searcy County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, HEATHER DAVIS, LT KATRINA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Miguel v. McLane
as 22-10517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Executive Director, Michael Searcy, Racheal Kingston and others
Miguel v. Abbott
as 22-50413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Abbott, Texas Governor, Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Center Office, Executive Director, Michael Searcy, Texas Civil Commitment Center Office, Operation Spec. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
