Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tinsley #119836 v. Braman et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Ralph Tinsley #119836
Defendant:
Melinda Braman, Unknown Batter, Davis Martin Beadfild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Tinsley v. Hill
as 2:2023cv01036
Petitioner:
Donald E. Tinsley
Respondent:
T Hill and T. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moon v. Boyd, et al
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Ned Boyd, Patrick James, Nicole Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Buffor et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Defendant:
. Buffor, Zacarias, . Durre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McCurdy et al
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Respondent:
Joel McCurdy, Utilizaton Review Committee, Kim Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Tinsley v. Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 23-1174
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Tinsley et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv10262
Plaintiff:
Ralph Tinsley, Masty, Silzs and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Batter, Davis and others
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNKLEIN FORENSIC CENTER, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7194
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE TINSLEY SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
