Cases 11 - 20 of 56,746
Philmore v. Booher
as 1:2024cv00712
Petitioner:
La'Ron D. Philmore
Respondent:
Bradley M. Booher and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LE BOSS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
RYAN TODD LE BOSS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cornish v. Frazier
as 24-1949
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN RYAN CORNISH
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. FRAZIER, Butner Legal Center
Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Paul D Mitchell, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette S Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
KEYONTAE D. CURTIS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Bowman et al
as 4:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Jessie P. Skinner
Defendant:
Jevon Bowman, C. Alexander, James Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carey v. Keeton et al
as 2:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carey
Defendant:
D. Keeton and Jeff Dirkse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Parra et al
as 4:2024cv03598
Plaintiff:
Stanford Paul Bryant
Defendant:
J. Parra, J. Patricio, Correctional Officer D. Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
