Cases 21 - 30 of 418
Wells v. Law Offices of Schiro & Zarzynski et al
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Dizzy D Wells, Jr and Dizzy Dean Wells, Jr
Defendant:
Law Offices of Schiro & Zarzynski, Atty John S Schiro, Atty Jeffrey P Zarzynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hay v. Applequist et al
as 5:2023cv03175
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mark Hay
Defendant:
Keri Applequist, Lesia Dipeman, Haleigh Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kidd v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00574
Petitioner:
Angelo Kidd
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Augustine v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Michele Dauzat, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shaun Steven Kidd
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wheater v. Gallaird et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Billy Wheater
Defendant:
Karl Gallaird, Brandon Wilbanks, Sherry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowry et al v. Rop et al
as 5:2023cv03138
Plaintiff:
Lenny Dean Lowry and Mark Edward Dowling
Defendant:
Gabriel Rop, Courtney Wagner, Christine Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Caruana et al
as 3:2023cv50222
Plaintiff:
Timmothy Greene
Defendant:
Gary Caruana, C/O Callahan, C/O Longhore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Kidd et al
as 3:2023cv50194
Plaintiff:
William H. Carr
Defendant:
Valerie Kidd, Jena, Gary Caruana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Baker, et al
as 23-3093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY S. KIDD
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY BAKER, TYLER JONES, MICHAEL FALCK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
