Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Glover v. Hunter et al
as 5:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Alvin Glover
Defendant:
C Hunter and G Bolin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hunter v. Randall Mathena
as 12-8171
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES C. HUNTER
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL C. MATHENA, Chief Warden
Hunter v. Mathena
as 1:2012cv01088
Petitioner:
James C. Hunter
Respondent:
Randall Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Castillo
as 6:2011cv03336
Petitioner:
Anthony C. Hunter
Respondent:
Juan D. Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Britt v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2011cv01579
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Teal, C Hunter and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Plaintiff:
Alkeem Jamar Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Peters v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 10-40796
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY SHANE PETERS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, LONNIE JOHNSON, Warden I, E. BENOIT, Warden II and others
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Defendant:
S Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2010cv00050
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00131
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman, Lonnie Johnson, Edmund Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Petitioner:
Tony Shane Peters
Respondent:
N. Quarterman, L Johnson, E Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
