Cases 21 - 30 of 3,251
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Johnson v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
M Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ellis v. State of Colorado Mental Health Hospital, et al
as 24-1166
Plaintiff:
DAWAUNE ELLIS, II
Defendant:
THE STATE OF COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL IN PUEBLO, SARA ACKERMAN and FEERLYN WHITAKER
Ellis v. Arias et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Travis Ellis
Defendant:
Roberto Arias, Brenda Figueroa, Marco Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Ellis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Bodwin v. Collier
as 24-40213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M. Garcia, Michael O. McNeil and others
Bond, et al v. Sheriff of Ottawa County
as 24-5035
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN P. BOND, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terral Ellis, II, deceased, TERRAL B. ELLIS, SR. and SHELLY BLISS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF OTTAWA COUNTY, in his official capacity, OFFICER JOHNNY BRAY and OFFICER CHARLES SHOEMAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
