Cases 21 - 30 of 14,163
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Titus Henderson v. Edward Wall, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD WALL, GARY BOUGHTON, SARA MASON and others
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Rodric D Cohns
Defendant:
Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant:
Tom Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Gaston et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Chantea Tamika Terrell
Defendant:
Sergeant Gaston and Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary-Bey v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 7:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent:
United States Federal Corporation and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner:
Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
