Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv02310
Petitioner:
Matthew Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Interested Party:
Jeremy Schepers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Thamrong et al
as 1:2019cv05671
Defendant:
MD Ponni Arunkumar and MD Thamrong Chira
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartley v. Jenny Stewart Medical Center et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Newby, Dr. Matthew Johnson, Christian County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartley and Christopher Douglas Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Hopkins County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 4:2018cv00188
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail Medical Staff, Leigh Ward, Tiffany Pile and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delon Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv03250
Defendant:
Brenda Smith, Doug Witte, Deborah MacNeill and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Funk et al
as 4:2018cv00170
Defendant:
LT Moore, Major Jack Jones, Angie Funk and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Beck et al
as 3:2018cv03277
Defendant:
Vivian Brown, Kate Daniels, Sangamon County Jail Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Terrell Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Dayton et al
as 0:2018cv03004
Defendant:
Brenda Smith, Stephan Cranna, Brandon Huynh and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eppler et al v. Ryan
as 3:2018cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chad A Coker, Anthony Gaines, Robert Sedova and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sharp County Detention Center
as 1:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
