Cases 21 - 30 of 13,312
ZOOK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ZOOK
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NORMAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalombo v. Matthew et al
as 0:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Matthew and Kandiyohi County Jail, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alward v. Newell et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gayden, Jr. v. USA
as 24-11074
Petitioner:
JOHN MATTHEW GAYDEN, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv03199
Plaintiff:
Matthew Benjamin Major
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Google.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koroma v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Konbeh Koroma
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Brett Turley, Stephen Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: ALWARD
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwyer v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 5:2024cv03036
Petitioner:
Matthew C Dwyer
Respondent:
SCDC and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
