Cases 21 - 30 of 2,040
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
JILL E. RANGOS, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Webb et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Smith
Defendant:
Jon Webb, Jeffrey Standard and Ryan Maride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Shea et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Callee Webb
Defendant:
Keith E. Shea, Hoffler, Julian Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Michael B Webb, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Colbert et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Lee Baker
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Colbert, Unknown Chambers, Dr., A.W. Ping and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb-EL v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-EL
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and I. Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Adams, et al
as 24-4008
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR ROWLAND, JR.
Defendant:
R. ADAMS, Officer, FNU WEBB, Officer, B. EGBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
