Cases 21 - 30 of 395
Alford (ID 57845) v. Harrod et al
as 5:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Brent L. Alford
Defendant:
Gordon Harrod, Robert Wray and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Costianes v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Elias Costianes
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Matthew Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Seabolt v. Wray et al
as 7:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gratton Seabolt
Defendant:
Major Wray, Captain Smith, Mrs. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Wray
as 8:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baumberger v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv01491
Petitioner:
Jon Wray Baumberger
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
