Cases 31 - 40 of 125
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lipscomb v. Hansen et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Mr. Hansen, R. Osborne, Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Yokois v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS D. YOKOIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director and individually at Arizona Department of Corrections, MICHAEL LINDERMAN, formerly named as Mike Linderman, in his individual capacity, JAMES VICKLUND, originally named as J. Vicklund, Senior Chaplain and individually at Eyman Complex, ADC and others
Daniels v. Proctor
as 3:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Daniels
Defendant:
Eric Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, State Classification Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Daniels et al
as 1:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Defendant:
C Daniels and T Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid v. Daniels et al
as 1:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Defendant:
C Daniels and T Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Edward C Daniel
Defendant:
B Hawkins, H Lochard and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. Davis, et al
as 16-1390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY BUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, C. DANIELS, ANTHONY OSAGIE and others
Yokois v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02856
Plaintiff:
Douglas D Yokois
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
