Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Bolden v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03486
Plaintiff:
Robert Bolden
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, Thomas R. Kane, Deborah G Schult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Schult
as 16-3460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ellis Walker
Defendant:
J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and Harley Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons
Defendant - Appellant:
Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Russell Perdue, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, David Salamy, Unit Manager, FCI Ray Brook and others
David Willink v. Christopher Sillivan, et al
as 16-41173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RICHARD WILLINK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER SILLIVAN, Individual and Official Capacity, KRISTIN WENZEL, Individual and Official Capacity, PAM PACE, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Willink v. Sillivan et al
as 6:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
David Richard Willink
Defendant:
Christopher Sillivan, Kristin Wenzel, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Pace et al
as 6:2016cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Bowman
Defendant:
Pam Pace, Virginia S Schafer, Michelle Lastrapes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Lynch et al
as 9:2016cv01292
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Thomas R Kane, Deborah G Schult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woody v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2016cv00862
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Woody
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons , Thomas R. Kane , Deborah G. Schult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Schult
as 15-1186
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH G. SCHULT, Warden, FCI Berlin
Smart v. Schult
as 14-2093
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERRY SMART
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH G. SCHULT, Warden, FCI Berlin
West v. Schult
as 14-1361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BLUE WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH G. SCHULT, FCI Berlin, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
