Cases 31 - 40 of 4,021
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Simpson v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6338
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BARTHOLOMEW SIMPSON
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, ROBERT MOSIER, JASON S. MIYARES and others
Bobby Glenn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11119
Petitioner:
BOBBY GLENN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Baker v. Blane et al
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Defendant:
Eve Blane, Norma Lay, Leamon Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Worden #189767 v. Gearland et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Marc David Worden #189767
Defendant:
Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson, Timothy L. Johnson and Timothy Leverne Johnson
Defendant:
Glenn Woods, Rhett Holden, Rodney A. Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10769
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Hampton and Curtis Lee Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, A. Douglas, Leslie Cummings and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
