Cases 31 - 40 of 2,231
HORNE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY A. HORNE
Respondent:
WARDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Big Horn County Jail, et al
as 23-8089
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRE Z. DAVIS
Defendant:
BIG HORN COUNTY JAIL and BIG HORN COUNTY JAIL CAPTAIN
Horne v. Thurman et al
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Cartez Horne
Defendant:
Justin Thurman, Sean Phillips and John Hollinsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Horn et al
as 7:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Mack Earnest Horn and Deputy Hagy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Caldwell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv06159
Plaintiff:
Davon R Williams
Defendant:
Caldwell County Detention Center, Autumn Evans, Mitch Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Finley v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv06110
Plaintiff:
Jamie Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer B. Rogburg, Sheriff Mike McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamlin v. Horn et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hamlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Horn, Mercer County Commission, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Horn v. Ford County Sheriff's Office
as 23-3068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID HORN
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
