Cases 31 - 40 of 1,102
MCCALL et al v. CALDWELL
as 1:2023cv02103
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MICHAEL MCCALL
Defendant:
NURSE KIM and EUGENE CALDWELL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 7:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Haley, et al
as 23-1098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHAD NOLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HALEY, JACE MCCALL, THE 16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
WALKER v THOMAS CONWAY et al
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Thomas Conway, David Jury, Larry Burchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v Thomas Conway et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Thomas Conway, David Jury, Larry Burchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCall v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Akevious McCall
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Muskegon County 60th District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Torrance Leon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County 60th District Court, Muskegon County Circuit Court, Michael J. Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Ray, et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Davontae McCall
Respondent:
H.L. Ray and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCall v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Davontae McCall
Respondent:
Warden H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
