Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 13,667
Miller v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff: Justin Ray Miller
Defendant: Public Defenders Office, District Attorneys Office and Rutherford County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant: J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00733
Petitioner: Richard Quinn
Respondent: Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner: STEVEN MILLER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Miller
as 24-7046
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FLOYD PRESTON MILLER, III
Self, Carl v. Cromwell, Dan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Carl F. Self
Defendant: Dan Cromwell, Timothy Thomas, Anna Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Higgins
as 4:2024cv00472
Plaintiff: David Miller
Defendant: Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Terrique Thompson
Defendant: Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant: NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
MILLER v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2024cv06627
Petitioner: WOODROW MILLER, III
Respondent: JOHN DOE, GOV. N.J. and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?