Cases 31 - 40 of 3,098
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant:
JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bevins #267562 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08061
Plaintiff:
Ryan September Wednesday Bevins
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Amy Lucero, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. McDonald et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Matthew X Winters
Defendant:
D McDonald, L Gray, Wilsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Samuel v. D. Goacher, et al
as 24-1103
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Samuel
Defendant:
D. Goacher, Corporal, Pope County Detention Center, C. Hilson, Correctional Officer, Pope County Detention Center, M. McDonald, Sgt., Pope County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benton v. DePiero et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lamar Benton
Defendant:
F. DePiero, J. Rawlings, P. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
