Cases 31 - 40 of 8,403
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10945
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denning v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Robert Powell, Matt Anderson, Wesley Shuman and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Roger Hood v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv02903
Petitioner:
Daniel Roger Hood
Respondent:
Warden, Superior Court of San Diego and County of San Diego of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
