Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Gaskin v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Woodall and Woodland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEWIS GANAS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rippy v. Crawford
as 3:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Rippy
Defendant:
Tony Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaskin v. Jackson
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Gaskin
Defendant:
Kathy King Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Herron v. Jennifer Redel, et al
as 12-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Lewis Herron
Defendant - Appellee:
Jennifer Redel, Asst. AG, George Lombardi, Terry Silver, CO II and others
BULLARD v. USA
as 1:2012cv00711
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LEWIS BULLARD, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William Lewis v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 12-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
James v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2011cv00198
Petitioner:
William Lewis James, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Gaskin v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS GASKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, in his individual and official capacities, RON WOODALL, in his individual and official capacities, JOHN DOE (MIKE), in his individual and official capacities and others
Warren v. Brewer et al
as 2:2011cv01901
Plaintiff:
John D Warren
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, William Humble, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
