Cases 41 - 50 of 28,695
Crawford v. Lumpkin
as 24-50371
Petitioner:
Avery B. Crawford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Luis Zavalza Sanchez
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abebe v. U.S. Federal Public Defenders Office et al
as 3:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe and Unula B. Abebe
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Public Defenders Office and William F. Nettles, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier, Kelvin v. Holtz et al
as 2:2024cv14083
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
J. Holtz, B. Stephenson, C. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel Torres v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Angel Torres
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01693
Petitioner:
Peter Acosta
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
