Cases 41 - 50 of 1,269
DANIELS et al v. BLAIR et al
as 2:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
KELVIN DANIELS and DANEE SLATON
Defendant:
EARNEST BLAIR, D. REEDER, LT. RADTKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Matthew Blair
as 23-6971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW EDWARD BLAIR
Blair v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Jonathon Tyson Blair
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General and Wyoming Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haner #508463 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Cody Christopher Haner #508463
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Santiago v. J.C. Blair Clinic et al
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Torres-Santiago
Defendant:
J.C. Blair Clinic, Kevin Kauffman, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. BLAIR et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER
Defendant:
STELLA BLAIR, KELLENIE REINKE, BRANDI SALKILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Dustin Blair Henry
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blair v. Tony
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Woody A. Blair
Defendant:
Mrs. Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
