Cases 41 - 50 of 677
Rodriguez v. Bigswarfe et al
as 9:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Keith Rodriguez
Defendant:
Brook J. Bigswarfe, Thomas Armstrong, Peggy Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTLETT v. MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM et al
as 1:2021cv02584
Plaintiff:
JEREMY M. BARTLETT
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY CO. COURT SYSTEM, DANIEL G. PETRIE, HARRY A. SIAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Champius et al
as 1:2021cv05025
Plaintiff:
Niesha S Gates
Defendant:
Peggy Champius, Joy Tull and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batton v. Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SARA BATTON
Defendant:
SANDUSKY COUNTY OHIO, SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SANDUSKY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamner v. Mannis et al
as 2:2021cv00062
Defendant:
Annette Clark, Peggy Pitts, Tabetha Inman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv00343
Defendant:
C/O 2 HARAUSE, C/O1 JEREMIAH LEWIS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRICENO v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv00635
Respondent:
PAUL DENOFRIO and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Petitioner:
PEGGY COROMOTO BRICENO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Miles v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv00290
Defendant:
D Lorenza, NaphCare Inc., F Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
