Cases 51 - 60 of 409
Jackson v. Stitt et al
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Officer DeShields, Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv05089
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Parks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ambrose v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00672
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Ambrose
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Buchannan et al
as 1:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Robinson
Defendant:
Buck Buchannan and FNU Adominis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bearman v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Bearman
Defendant:
Gonzalez Pest Control, Mr. Joseph Gonzalez and Mr. Scott Ely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04101
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Cooper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sprouse #188459 v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01062
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Sprouse
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Hendrix
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Defendant:
USA, Tennessee, State of and DeWayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wadena v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00227
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Wadena
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Allen
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
