Cases 51 - 60 of 206
Johnson v. Crane et al
as 4:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Larry Crane and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2019cv00236
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2019cv00899
Defendant:
Postal Service (U.S.) and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arellano v. Lamborn et al
as 3:2019cv02360
Defendant:
Huffman, United States Postal Service, Daniel G. Lamborn and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cooper v. Buffington et al
as 2:2019cv03015
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, The and Lisa Buffington
Plaintiff:
Donna Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01747
Defendant:
Tom Wolfe, Keefe, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearing v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Wilkinson County Correctional Facility and United States Postal Service
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moise v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2019cv02858
Defendant:
John Doe and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Moise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00665
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Georgia Department of Corrections, States Government Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adefeyinti v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv04997
Defendant:
Michael Carroll, United States Postal Service and State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Adekunle Adefeyinti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
