Cases 61 - 70 of 1,017
Rushing v. Yakima County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv03138
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rushing
Defendant:
Yakima County Department of Corrections and Walla Walla State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAINE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
DILON BLAINE
Defendant:
DAVIS, RUSH and ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIVENS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant:
DR. (FNU) COLLINS, CAPTAIN (FNU) INGRAM, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINT v. OLIVER
as 1:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SWINT
Defendant:
L.J. OLIVER, EARL JONES, PATRICIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harold Yaritz v. Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, et al
as 23-2705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold David Yaritz
Defendant / Appellee:
Underwriter of Rush City/Moose Lake, DOC Department of Finance, Paul Schnell, DOC Commissioner, Michelle Smith, Deputy Commissioner and others
Larry Rush v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 23-2177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY RUSH, a/k/a LEROY THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Ware v. Warden, MCF Rush City
as 0:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Marion Q Ware
Respondent:
Warden, MCF Rush City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
