Cases 61 - 70 of 11,351
JOHNSON v. MALDONADO et al
as 2:2024cv03617
Respondent:
SANTIAGO AMARO AMARO, SR and HARRY FELICIANO MALDONADO, SR
Petitioner:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hayes #342545 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01864
Petitioner:
Eric Lee Hayes, Sr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv02124
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcellus Alexander Greene, Sr. v. Robert Bridges et al
as 2:2024cv06506
Defendant:
Paul Murdock, Christopher Matosich, Brandon Price and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A. Greene, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Banks et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Juanece Banks, Frederick Russell and others
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Defendant:
Lois Fegan, J. Hampton, Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nutt v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
John Nutt, Sr
Defendant:
Barry Hyde, Nelson and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00931
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Torrence Harris, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alphonso Bell v. Brown
as 24-6703
Defendant:
CONTROL, Control Worker, BROWN, Lt. Deputy and GREEN, Deputy Sheriff
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20318
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
