Cases 61 - 70 of 154
WIMBERLY v. FEATHERSTON et al
as 2:2018cv00473
Defendant:
MICHELLE ENGLADE, WILLIAM BARLOW, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE OFF. and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Templeton v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01798
Plaintiff:
Alec E Templeton
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Martin et al
as 1:2018cv02551
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Smith
Defendant:
Bradley Martin, Michael Hammen, Robert Cessna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamps v. Limbaugh et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Stamps
Defendant:
Christopher K. Limbaugh, James Goins, Jerry Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Templeton et al
as 4:2018cv03025
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Omaha Police Department and Ryan Templeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Templeton v. USA
as 18-35020
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES TEMPLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bismillah v. LaSalle County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv08787
Plaintiff:
Tyrell D Bismillah
Defendant:
LaSalle County Sheriff, LaSalle County Jail, Thomas J. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Retelsdorf et al
as 8:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Brenda Leuck, Sean Lynch, Judge Leigh Ann Retelsdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. USA
as 6:2017cv00615
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerald Dwayne Templeton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
