Cases 81 - 90 of 6,250
Wolfe v. Hocking County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wolfe
Defendant:
Hocking County Sheriff's Department, Chief Deputy Caleb Moritz, Deputy Craig Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spence v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Spence, Jr.
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Austin Garrett, Cerion Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mountjoy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Osceola)
as 6:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Rodney Craig Mountjoy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Ores et al.
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Eckstein
Defendant:
Parole Officer Craig Ores and Brian Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVERY v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
CRAIG DEWAYNE AVERY
Defendant:
JUDGE SIZEMORE, LEWIS LAMB, LEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Craig Bailey
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Rewerts
as 5:2024cv10232
Petitioner:
Craig Laquintz Tyson
Respondent:
Warden and Randee Rewerts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
