Cases 1 - 10 of 3,843
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flakes v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Flakes
Defendant:
David W. Mitchell, Michael T. Bailey, Brandon Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blue v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Frank Blue, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Bailey, Unknown Burks, Unknown Fatoki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey #361996 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Leon Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jennings
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Albright
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Judge Alan D. Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gata v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Alisbey Santillon Gata
Defendant:
Brian Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
