Cases 1 - 10 of 18
JOHNSON v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2024cv02303
Petitioner:
DAVON L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HOLBROOK, RYAN A. PFEFFERIE and KAITLYN C. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lampkin v. Cox et al
as 6:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Dannal Cox, R.S. Simmons, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Northeastern Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Elijah C. Stephens
Defendant:
Northeastern Judicial Circuit and Jeffery Rockfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. LEAKE
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. STEPHENS and GEORGE CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER DAWN LEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gonzales v. Stephens et al
as 1:2021cv00652
Defendant:
C. Stephens and K. Nouwels
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Steel et al
as 1:2020cv02871
Defendant:
Shane Doe, Waukegan Steel and Wesley Love
Plaintiff:
Dewaun C Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv00882
Defendant:
P. TALBOT, R. CARTER, J. ERNEST and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. RINEHART et al
as 1:2019cv00615
Defendant:
WALKER, COUNSELLOR, ERNEST and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Stephens
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Mahally et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Petitioner:
Jeffrey C. Stephens
Respondent:
Leo Dunn, PA Attorney General and Lawerence Mahally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
