Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Thompson v. Hayden et al
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Hayden, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Licata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Poston et al
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thompson
Defendant:
Brandon Poston, Shelby Dixon, Fernando Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Dustin Daniel Thompson v. Dr. Barsom
as 5:2019cv01442
Petitioner:
Damon Dustin Daniel Thompson
Respondent:
Dr. Barsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
F. MCKINNEY, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC., WYTTE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerry v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03047
Defendant:
Jacob Bents, Keith Broadfoot, Busboom and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Frank Guerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv10490
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thompson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, The Kone Company, Paul D Klee and others
Small v. Huddleston, et al
as 12-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRON DUANTE SMALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF HUDDLESTON, MARK CHACON and DANIEL THOMPSON
Thompson v. State of California
as 2:2011cv03340
Petitioner:
Daniel Thompson
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Lefler v. Ken McKee, et al
as 11-2240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT J. LEFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN MCKEE, Warden; sued in his official and personal capacity, DAVID JOHNSON, also known as Unknown Johnson, WILLIAM MORROW, Program Coordinator; sued in his official and personal capacity and others
Bloxson #168081 v. Thompson et al
as 1:2010cv01303
Plaintiff:
Peter Bloxson #168081
Defendant:
Daniel Thompson and Mike Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
