Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Johnson v. Sarah Kariko, et al
as 22-35918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH KARIKO, MD, DOC's Chief Medical Officer, FRANK LONGANO, MD, DOC's Deputy Chief Medical Officer, PAMELY SAARI, ARNP, DOC's Care Review Committee & Chair Persons and others
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03628
Petitioner:
Willie Earl Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Billie Earl Johnson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00139
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv02084
Petitioner:
Willie Earl Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Kariko et al
as 3:2020cv05514
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Pamely Saari, John Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 7:2020cv00038
Petitioner:
Daniel Earl Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Baetz et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
James Earl Johnson
Defendant:
A. Baetz, Nancy Brenizer and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Johnson, Jr v. Rigling et al
as 2:2019cv01639
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
V Melendez, N Smith, C Rigling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
