Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fulkerson v. Williamson County et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Bryan Parke Fulkerson
Defendant:
Williamson County and f/n/u Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulkerson v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Bryan Parke Fulkerson
Defendant:
Williamson County Sheriff's Office and f/n/u Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulkerson v. Ricketts et al
as 4:2022cv03162
Petitioner:
Michael E. Fulkerson
Respondent:
Pete Ricketts, Nebraska State Patrol and Dawson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fulkerson v. Garland
as 4:2021cv03172
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Fulkerson
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hoffmeyer v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Aramark Inc., Sergeant Hillis, Captain Frisby and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Ronald Fulkerson v. People of the State of California
as 5:2018cv02501
Petitioner:
Kevin Ronald Fulkerson
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Fulkerson v. People of the State of CA
as 17-56848
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN RONALD FULKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BROOKING v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00013
Defendant:
JOSEPH ADAMS, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE BRANHAM and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE BROOKING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulkerson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05668
Petitioner:
Shane Kelly Fulkerson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fulkerson #967488 v. Washington et al
as 1:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Billie Fulkerson #967488
Defendant:
Scott Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
