Cases 1 - 10 of 1,003
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Quincy Price
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Warden Keith Cooley, Assistant Warden Brent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Rodriquez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ayla Rodriquez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Zoerner, DSO Aker, DSO Molinaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gawlik v. Borchet et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant:
Yvonne Borchet, Kasabji Majer, Kristen Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3030
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ROBERTSON
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ and others
Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra v. Gloria Liliana Sandoval Garcia
as 2:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra
Defendant:
Gloria Liliana Sandoval Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
