Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Thomas v. Big Daddy Convienant Store et al
as 3:2024cv03156
Defendant:
Willie Hurst, Lee LNU and Big Daddys Convienant Store
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jefferson City Correctional Center et al
as 2:2023cv04207
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Jefferson City Correctional Center, Justin W Davison, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Wells, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Williams and Sgt. Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Kempker
as 1:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Hudson, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven Kempker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerald Lee Miller, Jr. v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and T. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerald Banks v. A. Wingfield
as 22-6548
Petitioner / Appellant:
GERALD LEE BANKS
Respondent / Appellee:
A. W. WINGFIELD, Acting Warden
Uden v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 0:2021cv00218
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, Wyoming Attorney General, Michael Pacheco and others
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Uden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. AW Wingfield
as 0:2021cv01928
Respondent:
AW Wingfield
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv01403
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Doll v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Doll
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, J Wallen and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
